
days
hours
minutes
seconds
Law enforcement is more active and visible than ever. Our researchers looked past the seized servers and the arrests – at what a takedown does to the people who are still out there.
More arrests. More seized servers. More sanctions. So what is all of that doing to extortion? Our security research team built a dataset of publicly disclosed law-enforcement actions since 2020 and set it against leak-site data and the criminals’ own words. Their lens is criminology, not headlines: what a takedown does to trust, uncertainty and the way gangs judge their own risk – and whether they rebuild, rebrand or walk away.
The research combines our dataset of publicly disclosed law-enforcement actions with leak-site data and with what the groups themselves say – on leak sites, in affiliate discussions and in public statements. It does not treat a takedown as simply a success or a failure. It asks how severe the effects were, how long they last, and whether they can be reversed.

An intervention's technical reach may end with the immediate target, while its cognitive ripple effects travel further.
– Zohra Hamila, Security Researcher
Can a fake protest movement target your brand? → Explore | Cognitive
Did the AI attack wave arrive – or something else? → Explore | AI
Your biggest insider risk – malicious or well-meaning? → Explore | Threat Detection
How many extortion gangs are active – and who leads? → Explore | Cy-X
The CVE flood: did it reach real networks? → Explore | Vulnerabilities
